## AIOU SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2 CODE 8602 AUTUMN 2016 FOR B.ED LEVEL

Aiou solved assignment 2 code 8602 autumn 2016 is now ready for upload. So here is aiou solved assignment 2 code 8602 autumn 2016 for you. For the current semester B.Ed. students can find here this assignment on google here as:- aiou solved assignment 2 code 8602 autumn 2016, solved assignment 2 code 8602 autumn 2016, aiou solved assignment 2 code 8602 spring 2017, aiou code 8602 solved assignment 2 autumn 2016, autumn 2016 aiou solved assignment 2 code 8602.

TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY:-

We estimate test-retest reliability when we administer the same test to the same sample on two different occasions. This approach assumes that there is no substantial change in the construct being measured between the two occasions. The amount of time allowed between measures is critical. We know that if we measure the same thing twice that the correlation between the two observations will depend in part by how much time elapses between the two measurement occasions. The shorter the time gap, the higher the correlation; the longer the time gap, the lower the correlation. This is because the two observations are related over time — the closer in time we get the more similar the factors that contribute to error. Since this correlation is the test-retest estimate of reliability, you can obtain considerably different estimates depending on the interval.

PARALLEL-FORMS RELIABILITY:-

In parallel forms reliability you first have to create two parallel forms. One way to accomplish this is to create a large set of questions that address the same construct and then randomly divide the questions into two sets. You administer both instruments to the same sample of people. The correlation between the two parallel forms is the estimate of reliability. One major problem with this approach is that you have to be able to generate lots of items that reflect the same construct. This is often no easy feat. Furthermore, this approach makes the assumption that the randomly divided halves are parallel or equivalent. Even by chance this will sometimes not be the case. The parallel forms approach is very similar to the split-half reliability described below. The major difference is that parallel forms are constructed so that the two forms can be used independent of each other and considered equivalent measures. For instance, we might be concerned about a testing threat to internal validity. If we use Form A for the pretest and Form B for the posttest, we minimize that problem.

INTERNAL CONSISTENCY RELIABILITY:-

In internal consistency reliability estimation we use our single measurement instrument administered to a group of people on one occasion to estimate reliability. In effect we judge the reliability of the instrument by estimating how well the items that reflect the same construct yield similar results. We are looking at how consistent the results are for different items for the same construct within the measure. There are a wide variety of internal consistency measures that can be used.

AVERAGE INTER-ITEM CORRELATION

The average inter-item correlation uses all of the items on our instrument that are designed to measure the same construct. We first compute the correlation between each pair of items, as illustrated in the figure. For example, if we have six items we will have 15 different item pairings (i.e., 15 correlations). The average inter item correlation is simply the average or mean of all these correlations.

AVERAGE ITEM TOTAL CORRELATION:-

This approach also uses the inter-item correlations. In addition, we compute a total score for the six items and use that as a seventh variable in the analysis. The figure shows the six item-to-total correlations at the bottom of the correlation matrix. They range from .82 to .88 in this sample analysis, with the average of these at .85.

### AIOU SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2 CODE 8602 AUTUMN 2016 B.ED LEVEL